<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>philcrissman.com - Latest Comments in Scoble: Ballmer still doesn&amp;#8217;t get social networking</title><link>http://philcrissman.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 10:06:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Scoble: Ballmer still doesn&amp;#8217;t get social networking</title><link>http://philcrissman.com/2007/10/03/scoble-ballmer-still-doesnt-get-social-networking#comment-9805026</link><description>Well... from where I sit, one main reason _is_ just that: everyone else is. But I don't mean in the sense of, "everyone is wearing plaid knickers this year, so I will to." I think the services have value &lt;em&gt;because&lt;/em&gt; of the people who are on them. (This does create a bit of a catch-22 for anyone wanting to start such a community, but that's one of those challenges all the present networks have had to overcome as well).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Scoble uses the example of eBay; eBay would be worthless if it didn't have a large community of people buying and selling items. Likewise Facebook/LinkedIn/et al. would be worthless if you have no friends or associates using it; but if you &lt;em&gt;do&lt;/em&gt;, then there is value.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm definitely not suggesting there's much value in the proliferation of Silly Applications (Zombies? Werewolves? Pirates and Ninjas? Oh my) on Facebook, but I think it's function as a way to connect and stay in touch with people is potentially very valuable. MySpace; I do have one, but I've pretty much abandoned myspace.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Twitter is a different sort of thing, but I think there's value to be found there, as well, in the conversation -- but I've probably written enough about Twitter for awhile. ;-)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm definitely not saying that "everyone" must (or even should) have an account on MySpace, Facebook, Twitter, Pownce, Digg, Slashdot, Reddit, Virb, Bebo, etc, etc, etc -- not at all. But I think for those communities where one has connections, or could potentially create connections... to me, that has value. And &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; is what (I think) Scoble is saying that Ballmer's not getting.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;From the overly-long-comment department... thanks!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phil Crissman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 10:06:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Scoble: Ballmer still doesn&amp;#8217;t get social networking</title><link>http://philcrissman.com/2007/10/03/scoble-ballmer-still-doesnt-get-social-networking#comment-9805025</link><description>I'll be honest - I don't think _I_ understand the benefit of social networking. I'm on linkedin - I can see some potential benefit there - but I'm not on myspace or facebook, and I can't think of a compelling reason (other than, perhaps, "everybody else is") to join.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrben</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 06:25:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>